APOLLO REALITY 2 from Nasascam

Photograph above left is, believe it or not, a plaster paris model of Hadley Rille. The USGS made this plaster paris model before Apollo 15 supposedly landed on the Moon. How come? Well, according to NASA, apparently the Apollo missions did laser topography when circling the Moon. Funny that none of those astronauts from the previous missions made any mention of taking topography readings. The USGS then made a plaster paris model of Hadley Rille based on those topography readings, or so we are told. The picture shown on right, is a photograph of Hadley Rille supposedly taken by the Apollo 15 crew.

USGS then said they were amazed that the model made by them, before astronauts went anywhere near Hadley Rille, was so like the real thing. We the public are not amazed, as we can see the plaster paris model was the one used for the Apollo 15 photo. If photo on left was a plaster paris model taken on planet Earth, then why has it got reticles in exactly the same positions as the photo allegedly taken on the Moon?

In the photograph above, such a scenario is of course impossible, so I will explain how this can be. The lunar rover was simply lowered by the Langley crane onto the fake lunar surface created beneath it. NASA then photographed the lunar rover before it had moved. That explains why no tyre tracks. I hope you PANs are taking notes on this wealth of info, as I may be asking you questions on it later.

Picture right shows lunar rover on Moon (snigger), and on the front wheel, as clear as daylight, or should that be Moonlight (snigger again), can be seen a tyre valve for inflation.

The picture above was taken inside Langley Research Center, and it sums up everything about faking of the Apollo Moon mission photography. The very first fake Apollo pictures released to the press, WERE NOT digitally altered.

They were taken here using a fake Moonscape setup as shown. Notice curved black hoarding to create the blackness of space, and fake lunar soil spread over floor. This is where Buzz, Bean and Shepherd had their photo's taken stood by the US flag. The flagpole had a square flat plate at the bottom so that it stood upright. The flat plate was then covered with the fake lunar soil.

This photograph, with no reticles, is entitled "Apollo 11 Moon orbit". Unfortunately the picture was taken at LRC on June 13 1989, which is 20 years after Apollo 11. Why were NASA still faffing around with the Apollo Command Module years after the Apollo fairy story had finished?

The answer is because they were still producing better quality fake photos for future press and TV. NASA became a bit hot under the collar when approached by Tim Furniss, who wanted Apollo photo's for his new book.

Unfortunately NASA only had a few pictures, like those taken in the fake Moonscape to offer. This would look suspicious, bearing in mind the colossal number of pictures that were supposedly taken on the Moon. NASA had a problem which they never foresaw.

There are no reticles on photograph, and look at the length of shadows cast by the Moon mountains. The length of those shadows is colossal, many, many miles long. Such a scenario is of course ridiculous. Look how high mountain ranges on Earth are, but they do not cast ridiculous long shadows across the Earth's surface.

The reason the shadows are so long is because the light source is but a few feet away from the plaster paris model of the Moon.

However the picture above closely resembles a picture supposedly taken 2 years later by a manned spacecraft orbiting the Moon. What I am saying here is, according to this picture, it is possible to get a photo of Earth rise above the Moon's surface without a manned space craft orbiting the Moon, or, this picture is also fake, when compared with the photos above. That Moon surface looks a bit dodgy to me.

THE SAME FLAG USED ON ALL FAKE APOLLO MOON MISSIONS

Two of the three Apollo 17 crew join in a celebration of their (fake) lunar landing by presenting flight controllers in Mission Control the flag which flew with them to the Moon.

Now hang on a bit, didn't every Moon mission leave the flag behind on Moon when they blasted off? Yes, as video's of lunar lift show it being blown over, (fake of course). So no flag was left on Moon because no astronauts went there.

The flag they are holding is the same flag used for all fake missions, and what appears in all fake photo's showing flag on lunar surface. Why use half a dozen separate flags when you can use the same one over, and over again, for repetition fake photo's?

Further examination of the picture above reveals he has lost his right leg completely, as one can see the fake lunar soil where his right leg should be. When composing fake pictures using "cut and paste" the above blunders are common if not checked correctly.

Whether NASA will extend the date beyond 2026 is anybody's guess. I suppose it depends on whether any of those involved in the scam are still alive. In 2026 however it will not come as such a shock, because the majority world population already know the truth behind NASA, and their fake Moon missions.

Remember plans to fake the Moon landing began shortly after Kennedy's speech, and went into overdrive under the Johnson administration. Could it be that Kennedy would not go along with scamming the American people, and therefore needed to be silenced? It does make one wonder.

I am in no doubt whatsoever that there will still be PANs in 2026 who will insist the Moon landings were real, even after NASA openly admit that they faked them.

In the above left picture look at sandy surface with Moon boot footprints, it's identical to the Moon boot footprints allegedly on the Moon, as shown in the black and white photo's. Notice other astronaut and Moon buggy in background. The main point to observe is the relative flatness of the foreground, and abrupt straight line where that foreground meets the background bushy area, which is but a few yards away.

Applying the same tactics as Tuttle, (see APOLLO FAKE), we could easily paste our mountain scene in the background, black the sky out, and there you have it, one photo taken on the Moon. In the right hand picture above, was it really necessary to dress up in full gear and pose on a sandy, rock strewn landscape to test the rover?

Yes because this picture, and the one shown above left, are just two of many taken during a break in the photographic staging sessions. The pictures from these so called training sessions were later revamped by Michael J Tuttle, (using Photoshop 3), as genuine photo's taken on the Moon.

The picture above left was taken at Kennedy Space Center, however those boulders appear to have a very similar layout to the boulders shown in the right-hand picture, which NASA claim is a photo taken on the Moon. How could NASA create a boulder strewn landscape before they had visited the Moon, and therefore had any indication of what the landscape was like?

The sculptured mountains shown in right-hand picture are plaster paris models made by USGS for creating fake Moon pictures.

The above picture on left was taken at Houston. It shows how NASA created a fake Moon crater. That same crater however appeared in quite a number of Moon photo's from different missions. In Apollo 16 picture of Charlie Duke by crater, this is the crater.

The rough edges, gaps and pockets between boulders were smoothed out with ash/charcoal. Overall this fake crater appeared in rough format for the Apollo 14 and 15 fake pictures, and smooth format for the Apollo 16 and 17 fake pictures. Picture on right is how the crater appeared in one of NASA's fake Moon pictures.

Clever people Armstrong & Co. They manage to place a gas station advertising placard, music sheet stand, and cordless strimmer on the Moon's surface, and yet leave NO footprints in the process of doing it. The centre picture appears to have some sort of one boot footprint. Must be that one-legged astronaut I mentioned earlier.

But wait, what do we see through the capsule window in that picture above? Why it's the light blue haze of Earth's atmosphere, living proof that capsule was only in Earth orbit. In fact that light blue haze streaming through capsule window, can be seen in video coverage from EVERY Apollo mission, Apollo 8 through to Apollo 17, as all were simply Earth orbiting.

Front end of this LM has undergone some sort of bashing with a sledgehammer or other. Well it's only a cardboard model innit, set against a fake backdrop of Moon surface.

MAKING A FAKE LUNAR MODULE AT JOHNSON SPACE CENTER

This picture was taken inside building No 5 at JSC. It shows astronauts sorting over disused metal cabinets etc, from which to build a mock LM for use in fake photographs. Notice the octagonal shaped box left of centre which was used to build the mock LM.

The photo below is to ridiculous for words. NASA claim this is the actual Apollo 16 Lunar Module on the Moon's surface. Look at all that gold foil around the base, and why is that gold foil not seen in the photo of Apollo 11 LM, after all they were of the same design. I would like to know how they got the Rover out without tearing this gold foil. In addition to the gold foil there is also some sought of black fabric draped just anywhere. What a mess, moreover what a joke.

Look at side of LM. It's made up of sheets of thin metal pop riveted together, or maybe cardboard held together with double-sided tape. Even the joints are not seated flat, but buckle out in all directions. The under side looks like corrugated sheet, and even that does not mate correctly with the vertical panels.

If this is top quality engineering for such an important mission, then I'm a banana. Can't you PANs see that this is a quick knock-up job, taken in a studio here on Earth, to satisfy gullible people like yourselves. No way did this heap of junk land, and take off, from the Moon. Incidentally Grumman built a life-size Lunar Module in cardboard, I think this is it.

In the final picture shown below we take a closer look at this supposedly high quality work from Grumman Engineering, and can see just what a botch job they made of it. NASA inform us that this piece of junk cost $350,000,000, ($30 billion at today's prices).

Look at the beading edge strip on corner edges, they cannot even get the angle correct, and have left it jutting out. I don't think NASA is taking the pee, I know they are. It's a joke, because I have seen better quality work from kindergarten kids building a stage prop for a school pantomime. Let's face it the whole Apollo project was a pantomime and the Apollo astronauts were nothing more than clowns. It really beggars belief that there are still millions of people around the globe who actually believe the Apollo garbage put out by NASA.

I find it somewhat scary to think that there are so many people in the world who are completely out of touch with reality. Blame the CIA, after all they saw that TV was a good propaganda tool to brainwash the media with, and they took full advantage of it.

Apolloreality 2 from Nasascam

Fake Moon Landing